Syrian rebel organization investigates beheading of infant seen in video

_89233602_channel-finder-cta-4-global-1000px

A Syrian riot group that has acquired U.S. navy backing stated it is investigating the beheading of an infant in Aleppo after video footage circulated showing the boy being killed through a person who activists identified as a member of the riot group.

Read More Articles :

Images of a fighter reducing off the boy’s head with a knife matched a number of the worst brutalities committed by using the jihadist Islamic Kingdom organization, which has killed hundreds of captives in Syria and neighbouring Iraq in the ultimate 3 years.

Before being killed, the boy is shown at the returned of a truck being taunted by way of several guys who say he is from a Palestinian faction which fights in Aleppo in support of President Bashar al-Assad.

“This is a prisoner from the Quds Brigade. They do not have guys any greater so that they’ve despatched us children nowadays,” one of the guys says. “Those are your puppies, Bashar, kids of the Quds brigade,” says every other.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights stated the guys had been warring parties from the Nour al-Din al-Zinki Motion, a rebellion organization which has obtained army assist channelled from Turkey, consisting of U.S.-made TOW missiles.

The U.S. Country Branch said on Tuesday that it changed into investigating the incident.

On Wednesday, a State Department professional said to us does now not publicly pick out the Syrian opposition corporations that obtain U.S. guide.

“We automatically vet the organizations we paintings with and aid, as you may count on, and their human rights report figures prominently in that,” stated the Kingdom Department legit, who declined to be diagnosed. “We do no longer assist businesses that condone this type of barbarity, period. We be aware that al-Zinki has said they will look into this incident, and we are hoping they accomplish that very well and transparently.”

In a announcement, Nour al-Din al-Zinki denounced what it described as “the human rights abuses that had been shared on social media web sites,” which did now not constitute its regulations or practices.